infinity wrote:Since there's limited time and resources, we don't want just 'do everything' and get burnt out
Absolutely... "If you book them, they will come". Word of mouth tends to be the best advertising technique.
I like that people tend to find the daniel papers when they are curious enough and ready for it and not because we are out promoting it in as many places as possible. It's a lot of work maintaining these different channels but with daniel's FB account he can easily post a link to his latest blog post using the share button, as can anyone else.
We should be careful not to promote the information here across as many social media channels as possible (most of which are full of controlled opposition and poisonous trolls) as we don't want to spread ourselves thin. Having a presence on facebook is fine as so many people use it and it's another doorway to the daniel papers and fora, even if it can get
lost in the sea of posts, which is a common thing on social media and a tactic of global psyops.
infinity wrote:Like Lonebear said, the people with the red pill in their hands already, so to speak. How do we make it easier for those people to find the good work that daniel, lonebear, etc. have put together?
Do those kind of people really use things like instagram or facebook much? How do those kind of people think and where do they go to find what they're looking for? Just because I browse a lot around in youtube for stuff like interviews and documentaries doesn't mean they do - but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe there are certain platforms that such people use more and those would be the best to make this stuff more accessible to.
Good questions, I don't see how Instagram would be useful, Youtube is a very popular channel but the research here isn't easily converted into video format unless we start making documentaries on it, a very resource intensive endeavour! We should probably see how the FB experiment goes and then reassess the situation later on...