Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Discussion on geoengineering, NEXRAD/ HAARP, climate change, chemtrails and related topics, including how to deal with the effects of these incursions.

Moderator:daniel

User avatar
daniel
Professor
Professor
Posts:886
Joined:Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:33 pm
Location:P3X-774
Contact:
Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by daniel » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:59 pm

Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, World Orders, Time Lines and Ascension (Click for PDF version)

Background

I was listening to exopolitics expert Alfred Lambremont on a radio show [Global Voice Radio episode, “Are You on the Catastrophic or Positive Timeline?”, August 13, 2012.], discussing the “negative timeline” as being some kind of “synthetic quantum environment” orchestrated by the Grey ETs, stating that this negative timeline was all “made up.” Having worked as a technician on the Phoenix III project (more commonly known as the time travel aspect of the Montauk Project), I have first-hand knowledge of what was going on and what they were trying to do—and it appears they are using some of the knowledge gleamed from those experiments in geoengineering application. In the 20 years that have passed since those experiments, I have learned much and decided to take a look at it in the context of the new knowledge provided by Dewey Larson's Reciprocal System of physical theory. [Reciprocal System of theory website (http://rstheory.org), was first published in the 1959 book, The Structure of the Physical Universe. The Reciprocal System is a theory of everything, based on two, simple postulates that produce the observed universe as a natural consequence. It has a number of notable successes, including predicting the existence of quasars some four years before they were actually discovered.]

Phoenix III was a covert attempt to determine the nature of time, if it could be manipulated, and if so, the process to do it. Without going into details, the short answer is that those involved never came to an understanding of time, other than it was not what conventional physics thought it was, but were able to make use of some of the technology obtained in order to perform temporal experiments into the “past” and “future.”

In order to access time, a navigation computer from a faster-than-light propulsion system was utilized to open a portal, from which a visual record could be made. In later experiments a way was found to send living organisms through this portal to other chronological periods, though this was highly dangerous and seldom worked as expected. Due to the nature of the equipment being used, only persons with a highly developed psionic ability could operate the equipment (psychics that were skilled in precognition.)

One of the issues was that the time travel experiments ran into a “bump,” literally, crossing the 2012/2013 year boundary (conventional calendar) and at the time, it appeared to be some kind of artificial reality that was constructed by the psychic running the chair. The “experts” did not know what to make of it, but for the most part, thought it was a realistic view of the period being viewed because it was consistent with different psychics and everyone sent forward returned with very similar information. Looking at it now, it would seem to be more consistent with an “synthetic quantum environment,” such as the one described by Lambremont, than a natural one, which may explain why it was always frozen past a specific point. With what we know now, there is a good deal of truth to what Lambremont is was discussing on that radio show.

Research into the strange weather being seen around the world (including the effects thereof; red rain, abiotic stress of plants with “sudden death,” extreme levels of radiation and ultraviolet light to name but the few) may have turned up what is going on… and it ties in with the old Montauk project. This interpretation explains the chemtrails, HAARP, geoengineering, underground cities, genetic engineering and even explains the timelines and the upcoming ascension to a higher density. [We (the scientific underground), prefer density over dimension when describing the increased complexity of organisms, since the number of spatial (yang) dimensions does not change—the number of available temporal (yin) dimensions, does, resulting in a compaction that has properties similar to the physical concept of density.] These connections cannot be seen by conventional science, due to various misconceptions treated as fact. [Some of the misconceptions being: the backward direction of stellar evolution, the omission of 3-dimensional time, the omission of the “cosmic sector” (the universe of antimatter), and the nature of radiation and x-ray emission.] With the information in Dewey Larson's books, Universe of Motion, Beyond Space and Time and the follow-up articles by Prof. KVK Nehru on the nature of the stellar interior and the sunspots, [KVK, Nehru, “Glimpses into the Structure of the Sun” series; Reciprocity XVII, #2 (Autumn 1988), Part 1, “The Nature of Stellar Matter” and Reciprocity XVIII, #1 (Winter, 1988), Part 2, “The Solar Interior and the Sunspots.”] what is going on starts to make a lot of sense. You think the politicians hide stuff—try scientists!

Most of the things going on are a reaction to a larger event. Find the cause, and the effect starts to make sense. So, let's start with the most obvious effect: climate change. And for that, we have to take a look at the single, largest effect on weather—sunlight—and where it comes from, the sun.

Stellar Evolution is Backwards!

In Reciprocal System (RS) physics, Larson comes up with a better structure for the atom, based on the concept of scalar motion, and as a natural consequence of that structure determines two “destructive limits” for atoms: a thermal limit and an age limit. The thermal limit is the common limit used in thermo-nuclear reactions, but the age limit is unknown to conventional science and concerns the capture of charged, electron neutrinos by the atom that create isotopic mass. [Larson, Dewey B., Basic Properties of Matter, Chapter 24, “Isotopes.”] When the age limit is reached, [Larson calls it an “age limit” because atomic process is similar to aging. The capture of neutrinos is inevitable over time, and irreversible, so eventually the isotopic mass becomes greater than the structure of the atom can contain, and the atom “dies” by a temporal explosion that is viewed in space as radioactive emission.] an element becomes radioactive and explodes. When Larson applied those concepts to astronomy, he found a different mechanism for stellar combustion based on those limits. Combustion is based on exploding atoms—fission, not fusion—and that led to the conclusion that astronomers have the stellar (and galactic) evolutionary sequences backwards!

In Universe of Motion, [Larson, Dewey B., Universe of Motion, Chapter 4, “The Giant Star Cycle.”] Larson shows the consequences of what happens when you flip stellar evolution around, making red giants the youngest stars, and the blue giants the oldest.

Backwards evolution made for a perfectly logical and consistent pattern of evolution eliminating the need for a bunch of devices that conventional astronomy introduced to try to make sense of their interpretation; things like dark matter, dark energy, black holes, quark stars, neutron stars… when you put the sequence right, they all become just distinct stages in a single, consistent, stellar evolutionary process.

As a consequence to setting the stellar evolutionary sequence straight, some conclusions are different than popular belief:
  • Stars start out as large dust clouds, condense into red supergiants, orange giants, yellow then white main sequence stars, then on up to blue giants, then supernova. The same process as heating up a piece of metal, from the initial red glow to where it gets blue-hot and breaks.
  • Since stars are built from dust and debris as fuel, the more fuel available, the hotter the sun will get.
  • As David Wilcock has identified in the past, planetary moons are leaving “trails” throughout the solar system, indicating we've entered a dusty area of space. With all this dust and debris available for stellar fuel, the sun is growing in size and getting hotter, moving from a class-G (yellow) star to a class-F (yellow-white) star.
  • Because our system of long-term dating is based on an assumption of radioactive elements being formed when the Earth was born—not being produced regularly—our system of geologic eras is drastically wrong. Astronomical events move thousands of times faster than assumed by astronomers. The planet and solar system are no where near as old as claimed and mankind has been around to see the sun “change” in the past.
When you consider these consequences from a corrected stellar evolution, one conclusion is obvious: global warming is not due to flatulent cows, but to the fact the sun is getting hotter, and will continue to get hotter. [About 9 minutes in to Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory television program, “Global warming” (season 1, episode 3), he interviews a reclusive “climate scientist” who has come to the same conclusion—it's the sun, not man, that is the cause of warming.]

Sun Heats in Quantum Steps, not a Smooth Transition

In the Reciprocal System, everything is quantized into discrete units. So is the case with the destructive limits… stars do not heat smoothly, but tend to stay at a specific temperature, then suddenly jump to a new temperature range as the magnetic ionization level increases (which controls the age limit). That is why we have a distinct color-temperature class system for identifying stars. The discrete jumps become very visible when you look at an H-R diagram with the correct evolutionary sequence, as stars move from red supergiants, to orange giants, to main sequence—distinct bars on the graph with few stars between them. The earlier stages of heating up takes bigger jumps than the later ones, so that is obvious here. [Has to do with the way magnetic ionization affects elements as a 2nd power function. With no ionization, elements up to 118 are stable. With unit ionization, everything from uranium up becomes radioactive—27 elements, which is current ionization level for Earth. At 2 units, everything from gold on up is radioactive—only 13 more elements added to the fuel source, and it diminishes from there.] Astronomers consider the giants to be separate from dwarfs because they do not realize the stars heat and condense in quantum steps—they assume a continuous change, so they miss the connection.

Radioactivity: Accelerating to FTL Speeds

Conventional understanding of radioactive elements needs some updating. In the RS, when you accelerate matter past the speed of light it becomes radioactive—it emits radio waves while it is throwing off particles. That's why they call it “radio active.” It has to do with the fact that the zone of isotopic stability inverts when you cross the speed of light. Atomic explosions in the stellar interior are violent enough to push motion past the speed of light, something that cannot be accomplished by electromagnetic means in particle accelerators.

For example, take U-236. Uranium is element #92, so it's natural mass is 184 (twice the element number) and the remaining 54 units of mass are “isotopic mass,” an accumulation of mass (neutrinos) that forms the 236 isotope. 184+52=236. Once U-236 is accelerated past the speed of light, the inversion takes place and the stable zone becomes 184-52 = 132. The atom has to throw off 104 units of mass (2x52) to become stable at FTL speed. This throwing off of isotopic mass is radioactive emission.

If you think back to the days of Bob Lazar and his claims that UFO propulsion used element 115… well, 115 has a natural mass of 230 and an estimated mass of 288, meaning there are 58 units of isotopic mass. 115 is highly unstable at speeds less than light, but only has a mass of 172 at FTL speeds—completely stable. Pull it out of the reactor, though, and you'll be bombarded with x-rays to the point of glowing in the dark. This is why the FTL drives are never shut down. Which brings me to the reciprocal process—matter dropping from FTL to sub-light speeds.

X-Ray Emission: FTL to Sub-light Speed

When high-speed matter drops below the speed of light, it must reacquire the isotopic mass it lost. In U-236, the FTL mass was only 132. When it drops back to sub-light speed, that mass must increase back up to 236 amu, which is kind of backwards radio-active emission on the other side of the speed of light boundary—the atom absorbs particles and emits x-rays, not radio waves, as it builds mass back. All elements dropping from FTL motion to sub-light will emit x-rays, and all astronomical x-ray emitters are demonstrating this process—including our sun.

The only sub-light speeds in the sun are in the photosphere. Once you get deeper inside, the magnetic ionization level is much higher and the age limit destructions are constantly accelerating matter to FTL speeds, which is why the lower layers of the photosphere are a radio source—it is the boundary to FTL motion. Every now and again, the sun burps [Described in detail in Prof. KVK Nehru's paper, “Glimpses into the Structure of the Sun.”] and some FTL matter comes out from the core to the photosphere, immediately starts cooling and drops below the speed of light generating a burst of x-rays and a rapidly expanding plasma—a coronal mass ejection. Because of the reciprocal relation, FTL motion is expanding in time, so compressing in space. When it drops sub-light, that compression re-expands like a spatial explosion. So CMEs are a good indicator of how turbulent the core is at FTL velocities.

Now you know that the reciprocal process to radioactive emission is x-ray emission, and both have to do with crossing the FTL boundary (sub-light motion in 3D space to FTL motion in 3D time). FTL acceleration produces radioactivity; deceleration produces x-rays.

The Solar Transition

Time to put pieces together… the sun is getting hotter from all the dust and debris the solar system is now experiencing.[The reason for the excess dust in the solar system is not clear, but astronomers have known it was coming for over 50 years. New Agers have billed it as the photon belt, but it is more likely to be just nebular dust or a protostar that is intersecting the plane of our solar system. As our sun, part of the Sagittarius Dwarf, intersects the plane of the Milky Way, such occurrences are very probable.] The increased fuel will increase the thermal destructive limit, which will cause a corresponding increase in magnetic ionization level, which will make more elements available for the stellar combustion process—the sun is going to get brighter and hotter. Initially, this will occur as bright flashes, [These bright flashes of the sun have been reported since 2010 at the higher altitudes, where the atmosphere is thinner and there is no pollution/smog layer. The increased intensity (flash) lasts for several minutes to several hours and tends to be laser-like, causing peculiar damage in a small area, such the sudden death of plants and trees (leaves are burned to a crisp) or the cracking of car windshields.] like a mini novae, until sufficient material is available to hold the magnetic ionization limit at the next quantum step. At that time, the sun will suddenly jump up in stellar class, and remain there. (Well, “up” in the Reciprocal System, “down” in conventional astronomy, since they have it backwards.)

The transition should be interesting. When the magnetic ionization level of the sun increases, it will be like throwing a cup of gasoline on the barbecue grill coals—a burst of flame and thermal activity, so much that it will move the thermal speeds past the speed of light. This “inverse thermal emission” actually occurs frequently on a small scale and is documented in detail in Prof. KVK Nehru's paper, Glimpses Into the Structure of the Sun: The Solar Interior and the Sunspots, and is the reason that sunspots are dark and appear cool. Inverse (FTL) thermal motion is super-hot, so hot that it appears cold and the region of the sun where it takes place goes dark, as in the sunspot umbra. There are already indications of this beginning to occur. [NASA spots giant, triangle-shaped dark spot on sun] Except this time, the whole sun will become an “umbra”—there should be a bright flash, like a nova flare, when the gas hits the fire (additional elements suddenly being available for fuel from the jump in magnetic ionization), then the sun will go dark, like it went out. But only for a short time, until the initial burst of new fuel has burned up and the sun returns to the zone of stability. Like most things, this has happened before [Mythological references to “three days of darkness” may have their origin here.] and will happen again.

Also recall the radioactive transitions. When the magnetic ionization increases, there will be a huge burst of radio waves as the material is accelerated FTL, along with the nova flare. The sun will go dark—FTL motion—and when it starts to light up again, there will be a huge burst of x-rays from the sun, and the possible ejection of a great deal of matter from the surface of the sun, due to the re-expansion of FTL thermal motion back to sub-light speed.

Post-Transition

After the transition is complete, the sun will be physically larger, brighter (more white than yellow) and hotter than before—and it is going to stay that way. One would think that this situation would make the inner planets go up like marshmallows burning on the campfire. But curiously, that is not the case. Seems that whoever designed stars and planets considered this, and used the energy of transition to aid in the further evolution of life.

What will happen is that, due to the increased FTL motion in the sun, the gravitational balance of the solar system will change. FTL motion is anti-gravitational, so the sun will literally push the planets further outward in their orbits in compensation—the year will get longer. [This has been recorded in mythology as occurring a number of times, from the 260 days, to 360, to our current 365 day year.] Being further from the sun, the planet will survive and establish a new ecosystem—but a different one.

The changes in the sun will also produce changes in the planets, particularly the electro-magnetic alignment of the poles. As has been noted in geologic records, the north and south poles of the planets have been in various locations across the globe—not because the poles are moving, but because the crust of the planet is moving relative to the mantle and core. There is also a high degree of probability that the even will trigger a “core flare”, and expansion event of FTL matter in the core dropping to sub-light speeds and causing the crust of the Earth to expand and open at tectonic boundaries, eventuating in more surface area and a drop in ocean levels as compensation. [Peret, Bruce, “At the Earth's Core: The Geophysics of Planetary Evolution”, Reciprocity XXVII, № 1 (Spring, 1998).]

In my opinion, this solar transition is the “harvest” or “ascension” to a new state for life on Earth—not just man—all life on Earth. All the physical properties get “kicked up a notch,” as Emeril would say, commonly known as a “higher density” or a “higher dimension.”

A Hot Time in the Old World, Tonight

If you were NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or the “powers that be” and knew the sun was constantly getting hotter, [Larson gave many lectures to NASA back in the 1960s when they were trying to get into space—so highly probable they know what is going on; at least in the upper echelon.] but did not know the specifics because you listened to conventional scientists with their backwards stellar evolution, what would you be likely to do? Obviously, come up with a long-term strategy to deal with the excess heat. Back in the 1950s, a study was made on such a possibility and came up with three alternatives:
  1. Use nuclear weapons to blow holes in the upper atmosphere to let the increasing heat out,
  2. Create huge, underground cities to live in until the sun stabilized, or
  3. Get the heck off of Earth.
The first one was a bit preposterous and could not be pulled off without public knowledge, so they started the 2nd and 3rd.

The underground bunker approach was simple enough, as one of the features of HAARP, [After discovering that the ionosphere reacted strongly to HAARP transmissions, the project was militarized (see US Patent 4,686,605, “Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere”) and can now create ionospheric lenses that can be used to focus the sun's rays on a specific area, causing a localized rise in ground, ocean or atmospheric temperatures. This updraft creates a low pressure system at low altitudes and a high pressure system at high altitudes, and can be used to modify the flow of weather patterns.] the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, was that it was able to probe well beneath the surface of the earth looking for oil and minerals resources, but also identified large caverns that would make excellent cities for them to stockpile and ride out the transition in comfort. [Alex Jones of InfoWars.com reported these underground cities are large enough for 80,000 people with supplies for 30 years.] Construction of these underground bunkers has been in progress for decades, and Alternative 2 is nearing completion.

NASA came into existence shortly after this report was issued; some believe as a direct consequence of Alternative 3. Their mission was to find out what was “out there,” and what they found was that mankind is not going anywhere else, any time soon. [What they found “out there” will be addressed in a separate paper. Mankind is far from alone and not well received.]

With Alternative 3 not viable and knowing they would be stuck here with the rest of us, and not particularly wanting to live underground all their lives, they needed to come up with a way to make their Utopia on Earth… and that is geoengineering. Change this planet to be resistant to the solar changes they knew were coming and keep their corporatocracy [the rule by corporations.] going.

Geoengineering: Customizing the Planet

First thing they had to deal with was the sun getting a lot brighter from the combustion of dust and debris, now present in significant quantities in the solar system. They needed to come up with a way to create a “global dimming” effect to block off this bright light. Aluminum, a nice, lightweight and very abundant element, works rather well for that as most of our mirrors today are coated with aluminum (not silver). Nanoparticles, distributed in the tropopause (about 7 miles up [The aircraft observed dumping “chemtrails” are normally at 35,000-40,000 feet—6½ to 7½ miles.]), would increase the albedo of the Earth and turn the upper atmosphere into a partially-reflecting mirror. [Could not make it orbital, as solar radiation would vaporize aluminum and blow it away with the solar wind.] This has the result of “global dimming” on the surface.

Next problem is the x-ray bursts. The Van Allen belts protect the Earth from most particulate radiation that comes from CMEs, but that magnetic field barely slows down x-rays. Fortunately, back in the 1950s a technology came available that had to address a similar problem—the Cathode Ray Tube, or CRT. CRTs were a large x-ray emitter, pointed right at the person watching the screen. To get this technology out, they had to develop something to block x-rays but not interfere with the picture. They tried lead, but after being bombarded with x-rays for a while, a lead film turned brown and messed things up. It was OK for the sides of the tube, but not the picture screen. Searching around, they found a couple of oxides that did an excellent job at blocking x-rays and stayed viable for a long time without browning out. That was a combination of barium and strontium. [They use to list CRTs as highly toxic because of this—if you broke one you had to make sure not to touch the broken glass, as it was considered poisonous.]

They also expect huge particulate radiation from both the CMEs and the solar heat-up, so they looked for a way to increase the magnetic flux in the upper atmosphere, which as been popularized now as “magnetic reconnection”—not a natural phenomenon. Aluminum, barium and strontium are paramagnetic and what was really needed was a ferromagnetic material… how about another popular metal, like iron? Might make the sky and rain turn a bit reddish on occasion from iron oxide, but you could just say the people who saw that were crazy. And so what if thunderstorms got massively more violent from the conductive metals in the atmosphere (super-cell storms). People don't pay attention to things like that, right? [Abundant iron provides a generous growth medium for ferrous-feeding bacterias, particularly MAC (mycobacterium avium complex), which is the cause of many respiratory problems these days. Just a convenient side-effect for the pharmaceutical companies to profit on.]

So they developed a technique to disburse aluminum, barium, strontium and iron in the stratosphere using the 10,000+ aircraft [http://planefinder.net/, which tracks every plane with a transponder—the volume of air traffic is amazing, to say the least.] that are in the sky, every hour of every day. All they had to do was develop an aerosol and fuel additive, and “let 'er fly” to “git 'er-done.” Couple the aerosol dispersion system with a GPS (Global Positioning System) and you can even control precisely where the chemicals get dumped, without the pilots ever realizing anything is happening.

Now if you look at chemtrail fallout in snow, ice and rain… what do you find? Aluminum hydroxide, barium oxide, strontium oxide and iron oxide. The same elements listed on climate modification and geoengineering patents. What a coincidence.

As to the question of “global warming”… yes, the planet is heating up. However, due to the global dimming [Global dimming on Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_dimming for some propaganda on global dimming, but right now, about 20% of the sunlight is being blocked.] created by the chemtrail project, that heating up actually turned to a bit of cooling for a short time, causing conspiracy theorists to say the whole global warming thing was a farce. But if you've been outside lately, it is obvious that the sun is significantly brighter than it used to be, particularly at the higher elevations. And the chemtrail sunscreen is failing, though they constantly double efforts to reinforce it.

The experts are well aware of the sun becoming brighter and hotter, but you can't get the sun to pay “carbon taxes” for causing global warming. But if “man” is the source of the global warming, then you've got yourself one major cash cow with carbon taxes, environmental research, cleanup, breathing taxes, drinking taxes, waste reclamation taxes… to paraphrase Carl Sagan, “billions and billions” of bucks.

The initial geoengineering work was to block the solar changes and was just a temporary solution until the solar transition completed. But, like good humanitarians, the globalists saw a different picture… what if they destroyed the natural cycle and introduced an artificial one? One that they were the sole supplier for? And the only way you could survive was to pay through the nose.

Geoengineering and GMOs

The globalists have always profited on the pain and suffering of others, and this is no exception. They did not bother to put much research into the “side effects” of dumping millions of pounds of these elements in the atmosphere—they only considered the immediate need to protect from the solar transition and figured they could take care of the side effects later on. But here was a major opportunity in the form of disasters, pain and suffering.

A couple of the major side-effects were drought and superstorms. One cannot tip the seesaw, without having extremes.

Drought occurs in the areas that are being heavily seeded, as these nanoparticles in the upper atmosphere form condensation nuclei for rain—but there are so many nuclei, they never condense sufficient water on them to get heavy enough to fall out of the sky, at least not right away. They just stay up there as water vapor, drifting with the air currents, creating drought conditions below. Given enough exposure to moisture over time, they will condense sufficiently to form rain. Due to the significantly higher volume of nuclei, will have a much higher “rain density” than a natural storm, so when it rains, it pours—the superstorm. This creates an unnatural dichotomy; upwind you will have drought, downwind you will have excessive rain.

Also, nanoparticle vapor could be knocked out of the sky with an application of RF energy to shake things up a bit and cause condensation and rain. Thermal vibration causes collisions, and collisions have the tendency to merge particles. Experiments along this nature has been conducted by Arco Power Technologies [APTI, Inc., the company that built HAARP, is assignee on patents, such as: 5,202,689: Lightweight focusing reflector for space, 5,041,834: Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted, 4,999,637: Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth, 4,873,928: Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation.] over the years for weather modification that resulted in HAARP, which had all the tools to do this. These metals in the upper atmosphere made it incredibly simple to control the weather, planet-wise. If you control the weather, you control the world.

Controlling the world through weather has its own side-effects, particularly since it tends to poison all the life on the planet. In order to keep things going—and under their control—the genetic makeup of life had to be altered to be tolerant to the new, planetary climate—particularly aluminum and barium (natural strontium is actually beneficial—makes better bones than calcium).

One of the things that must be kept in mind is that this started in the 1950s. It has been in progress for some time and if you think all those cattle mutilations were done by ETs with anal probes, think again. Cows have blood and organs that are compatible with homo sapiens. Great for genetic experimentation. Once the basics were worked out, they moved to humans, trying to find a better genetic design for man to live in this new, artificially-created environment that will continue to exist after the solar transition. This gave rise to all the UFO stories about human-alien hybrids. It was all just part of the genetic engineering that had to go hand-in-hand with the geoengineering.

If you look at all the weird UFO stuff going on over the last 60 years, most of it was nothing more than steps towards the focus of creating an artificial world and artificial population, to continue 3rd density life on the Earth after the solar transition.

And it was not just people. Long-term food sources had to be adjusted to remain viable in the artificial environment, and that's where your good friends at Monsanto came in with their drought-resistant, toxic chemical resistant, GMO foods. Sure, experiment with the mass population to find the good strains for the people who deserve them. And make sure you have HIPAA and “health care” to get all that genetic data back to the computers, to determine what worked and what didn't. After all, they're not collecting mountains of medical data, they are protecting your privacy!

They are really quite happy now with their little, artificial empire and are engaging in all the stalling tactics they can. The solar transition is already under way and all they have to do is keep the masses distracted long enough for the good stuff to start so they can lock themselves away in their underground bases and let the rest of us burn.

Or so they think. To quote Dr. Malcolm from Jurassic Park… “Life will find a way…”

ELE and Ascension

Extinction Level Events, ELEs, are not an “end,” but simply a time of change. Happens all the time in nature. Happened with dinosaurs, the hominids, uncountable millions of insects, bugs and varieties of plant life. Recent summaries say that the number of species going extinct has increased 1000-fold, compared to a century ago. But they aren't just disappearing… they are evolving. And that is what is supposed to be happening with mankind and the other intelligent life forms of Earth. (Humans are only the dominant species, not the only intelligent one.)

If the globalists had not started messing around with geoengineering and genetics some 50 years ago, humanity would have already been in the transition phase to a more complex form of life—a “higher density” expression of consciousness. All the GMO foodstuffs we are exposed to on a daily basis, combined with the chemicals used in climate modification, has delayed certain natural processes from being initiated.

In Dewey Larson's book, Beyond Space and Time, he discusses the “life unit,” the origins of the living cell and the biological level of existence. [Larson, Dewey B., Beyond Space and Time, pp. 70-88.] One of the more salient points concerning biological structure is that it mimics stellar behavior—life is composed of a stable combination of matter and antimatter (antimatter being called “cosmic matter” in the Reciprocal System that exists in 3-dimensional time). This linkage also has its sub-light (spatial body) and faster-than-light components (temporal mind or soul), and even continues one step beyond that into the realm of ethics and metaphysics—hence Larson's title, Beyond Space and Time.

Life has remarkable similarities to the various stages of stellar evolution observed by astronomers, when the evolutionary direction is corrected. Stars are born from a cloud of dirt make a body, the infusion of a soul as the compression of matter reaches faster-than-light motion, and its eventual death in the glory of a supernova. Life can be thought of as twin suns, one in space and one in time, linked together in a controlled explosion of energy, such that all the thermal extremes cancel each other out. As Delenn from Babylon 5 stated, “we are star stuff” [A paraphrasing of a notable comment by Carl Sagan.] and are inexorably tied to the stellar and planetary processes of the solar system. We have scratched the surface of these associations with concepts such as astrology and metaphysics, but only scratched.

The problem that has arisen is that for the last 50 years or so we've been blocked off from our genetic inheritance by geo- and genetic engineering. The proper signals to do a “life unit upgrade” were not received when they should have been, kind of like those people at the gym that wear headphones and don't see the basketball bouncing towards their face, despite people yelling to “look out!” Ker-smack, and they are totally caught by surprise.

Time to rip the headphones off of people, and let them hear the warning signs—and the signal to “upgrade” their psyche. There is still hope, but I don't mean from ETs…

Resetting Genetic Modifications

I have been doing some of my own, anti-GMO experimenting to see what it would take to get a “terminator seed” to germinate, based on the concepts discussed with David Wilcock in 2005, regarding the Russian “torsion fields” experiments to modify DNA. And I have had some success. Genetically-modified organisms, when exposed to a torsion field broadcasting “heritage seed” DNA, literally throws out the artificial changes and reverts back to the original DNA coding and germinates. Only about 15% success at the moment, but the important point is that it does work. And the seeds produced continue to germinate on their own. This, alone, gives me hope that if the artificial conditions being imposed on the planet were removed, life would quickly revert back to its “factory defaults,” pick up the proper signals, and begin the upgrade process—what is called “ascension.” After all, the Earth's core is the largest torsion field generator in existence on this world—someone just needs to push the “reset” button.

Geoengineering requires genetic modification to keep the status quo. If removed, nature will reassert itself and start the process of healing. The altered atmosphere and genetically modified organism are seen by nature as an injury and disease—and it can, and will, treat those injuries and kill the disease when given a chance.

The globalists must keep inflicting injury to the ecosystem in order to retain control of it. If they don't, they'll lose control of it and it will start to revert to what it should be.

Time Lines

About these negative and positive time lines that Lambremont and others are talking about… Having worked so much with the idea of a reciprocal relation between space and time, and it's Eastern counterpart, yin-yang, these negative and positive time lines need to be considered two aspects of the evolutionary process. It isn't going to be one or the other, it is going to be both.

The solar transition must occur, as it is a completely natural process that is observed all over the universe. It just needs to be understood that when the sun evolves, the life associated with it also evolves—the life on all its planets, moons, and everything inbetween.

What is being called the negative time line is the one the globalists want, their artificial environment with total control. If one remains 3rd density after the solar transition, that's exactly what they are going to have to have in order for 3rd density life to continue on Earth, as the conditions they are preparing for will actually exist—but only in 3rd density. And odds are, they won't last long, and the remaining 3rd density life on Earth will either die out, or have to be relocated to another world. (It is fear based, and they could certainly use a shoot-out between the “good guys” and the banksters to get that going. People living in fear will be stuck in 3rd density.)

The positive time line is the one of ascension, moving to 4th density and beyond. The solar transition provides the energy needed to push life forward in its evolutionary process. Granted, with Larson's research I can identify the mechanics behind it, all the way through the biological stages. But that is actually unnecessary once the evolutive connection becomes evident. The sun evolves, which caused the planets to evolve, which causes life to evolve. Everybody wins.
To a person going with the process, all they see is growth and improvement. To those left behind, they see chaos and destruction. You can be clobbered by a big wave on the ocean, or grab your surf board and have a great time riding it out. It is a personal choice.

The difficulty faced by the ecosystem of Earth is the unnatural tampering at a critical time. They may be able to mess up the atmosphere and genetics on the surface of the planet, but they still cannot touch the inner workings. And that is what people need to do—get back in touch with the planet, as a living, intelligent entity.

My working with plants and animals here have proved to me, beyond all reasonable doubt, that a reconnection to Earth initiates the transition and ascension process, regardless of what the globalists are doing. It puts us back on the positive growth line. I've literally resurrected burned-out trees from abiotic shock, which are now green and thriving in the new environment without genetic modification. In extreme drought and excessive heat, I still have squash plants about to invade the next county. No GMO needed, though a little “Miracle Grow” was, if you get the double entendre.

Epilogue

Like almost every aspect in our society, it still comes down to a “natural” versus “artificial” condition, whether it be a natural person versus an artificial, “corporate” person, real money versus fiat currency, or a natural, evolutionary world versus an artificial, 3D slave society.

I know there is a lot of talk about divine intervention, ETs, angels and whatnot coming to “save us”… sit back, the Calvary is coming. Being of Cherokee descent, that never sounded very good to me. But all mankind really needs is an anti-globalist inoculation, so these monsters dry up and blow away. I won't call them human, because after what I've seen at Montauk, I don't believe they are.

Personally, I don't want ETs intervening in our society, dumping their version of “absolute truth” on us. One thing I've learned in my life is that nothing is “absolute”… everything is measured relative to something else. It cannot be absolute truth, just truth relative to what the ETs have accepted as truth.
What bothers a lot of people is that many of us have spent most of our lives looking for truth, and now some alien is going to drop by and hand us a copy of The Universe for Dummies, which will do nothing more than make us feel like our entire life was wasted. I don't mind a few pointers, but I want to do the work for myself.

Now if the ETs want to come by with a big vacuum and suck off all the parasites that have retarded human consciousness and evolution, I'll be the first to shake their hand, claw, tentacle or whatever. But I don't really want to get rid of a world order, just to have it replaced by a stellar order, reeducating and reprogramming me with their truths so I don't have to think for myself.

Consciousness doesn't grow from being told facts—it grows from the search for them. And I think that is what the people of this world really need—a chance to grow up on their own in a free society. Hopefully, you can use this information to help people get that opportunity.

Addendum: Hurricanes

Using the information on the structure of the sun provided by Dewey Larson and Prof. KVK Nehru, one can infer a similar structure to planets (see footnote 18, page 5). Though the planets have an atmosphere rather than a photosphere, what goes on beneath the mantle is very similar to what goes on in the core of the sun—and the Earth produces similar effects as the sun, but just on a different scale.

One of the more prominent features of the sun is that of the sunspots, dark areas that often produce flares and prominences on a recurring cycle. Recent footage has also shown that “solar tornadoes” are present above these active areas of the sun, stretching thousands of miles.

If the Earth were generating its own version of sunspots, what would we see? First, a regular cycle, but at a different scale, rather than every 11.5 years, perhaps once a year. And when a sunspot formed, there would be a massive, vorticular motion to it that would pull up material from underneath and send it sailing out around it, just as the solar tornado does: we just call it a hurricane.

If one examines Figure 8, “Migration of Prominences” of Nehru's paper on “The Solar Interior and the Sunspots,” it shows that hurricanes show up at the same latitudes as sunspots, move in the same fashion, and diminish just as Nehru describes the sunspot cycle. There is a very high correlation. Hurricanes, like sunspots, are just a feature of planets. These are seen on other planets as well, such as the giant red spot on Jupiter—a hurricane.

Knowing that hurricanes are the product of “co-magnetic thredules” in the Earth's core, they are natural events and cannot be artificially created. Nor can they be directed in their early stages, when the magnetic forces are at their strongest. But they can be intensified during formation by the same process that creates the super-cell thunderstorm mentioned earlier—excessive amounts of water vapor nuclei forced into the upper atmosphere through chemical seeding of the tropopause to create vast quantities of clouds and torrential rain. When the generating thredule begins to collapse, the hurricane can be controlled by localized changes in temperature and pressure, just what HAARP does best.

This was observed in the case of hurricane Sandy. A small, tropical depression that never got to more than a Category 1 hurricane. Nothing spectacular about that, and common for this time of year—except the quantity of water vapor present in the system was significantly higher than it should have been. Watch the animations of the storm as it grows—the center of the storm is literally throwing off massive amounts of clouds because the small amount of ocean water being pulled up met the excessive amounts of condensation nuclei that were sent to that location via atmospheric chemicals—chemtrails.

The co-magnetic thredule creating this storm lasted longer than normal, which is why the storm followed the “sunspot” track, rather than being deflected by the Gulf Stream back out to sea, as hurricanes normally are. This indicates that, like the solar transition, the Earth is getting ready for a similar change down deep.

HAARP would not have been able to direct or deflect this storm with an active thredule, though they probably tried. It followed a natural course, but an unnatural intensity, thanks to chemtrail geoengineering.
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii

Space_Ace
Muggle
Muggle
Posts:3
Joined:Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:52 pm

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by Space_Ace » Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:56 pm

Very interesting. I read this before in pdf. I am an amature astronomer so this topic interests me. So all stars start as brown(some say our sun has a brown dwarf companion, any theories?), then become red...orange...yellow...white...blue...explode? Howcome most stars are brown and red dwarfs, do they spend most of their lives in this color and shorter and shorter periods of their lives as they get hotter? Besides your alternate theory, where can I find other such articles? All of them that I can search for are mainstream.

User avatar
daniel
Professor
Professor
Posts:886
Joined:Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:33 pm
Location:P3X-774
Contact:

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by daniel » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:41 am

Space_Ace wrote:I am an amature astronomer so this topic interests me. So all stars start as brown(some say our sun has a brown dwarf companion, any theories?), then become red...orange...yellow...white...blue...explode? Howcome most stars are brown and red dwarfs, do they spend most of their lives in this color and shorter and shorter periods of their lives as they get hotter? Besides your alternate theory, where can I find other such articles? All of them that I can search for are mainstream.
The entire theory on the backwards stellar evolution is in Dewey B. Larson's book, Universe of Motion. Not only stars, but galaxies as well! It's a fascinating read, particularly with the galaxies because when you flip the evolutionary direction it makes a lot more sense--all the shapes and attributes just fall into line. Starts out as globular clusters, to barred spirals, to the larger spirals, to the giant ellipticals, then on an exploding galaxy like M 87--that jet is part of the explosion process and will eventually result in a quasar/radio galaxy pair. (Yep, I like astronomy, too!)

You can buy it from the publisher, ISUS, at their bookstore: http://store.rstheory.org (or Amazon.com, if you want to pay more because of the reseller fees). It's a big, hardcover book, over 450 pages.

You can also download a PDF of the book at http://reciprocalsystem.org. Please respect copyrights--ISUS is making Larson's material available as PDFs for PERSONAL use, which means don't distribute or upload to scribd or other places. The reason I got involved with SoldierHugs is because of sovereignty and freedom, and if you are going to be a free, sovereign person--then please respect the rights of others and the efforts they are making to contribute to free knowledge.

I would also recommend Larson's paper, Astronomical X-Ray Sources, which is how I figured out what is going to happen with the sun during the transition.

(All the articles in the PDF are hyperlinked to the papers on reciprocalsystem.org, so if you just click on them, you can read the papers.)
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii

User avatar
MINIMOOSE
Muggle
Muggle
Posts:3
Joined:Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:05 am

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by MINIMOOSE » Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:34 pm

doesn't sumerian astronomy also talk about the galaxy moving from the outside inwards?

User avatar
daniel
Professor
Professor
Posts:886
Joined:Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:33 pm
Location:P3X-774
Contact:

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by daniel » Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:12 pm

MINIMOOSE wrote:doesn't sumerian astronomy also talk about the galaxy moving from the outside inwards?
I don't have the reference handy, but yes, they do mention it. As do the Norse Eddas. In mythology, the feminine is associated with inward motion, so when a goddess is extending her arms, it is pulling things together.
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii

User avatar
Kano
Mage
Mage
Posts:101
Joined:Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:42 pm
Location:Denver

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by Kano » Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:54 pm

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the info. What a treasure trove of perspective you have!

I was wondering if there are any other researchers/uncommitted investigators other than Larson who you respect who say similar things about the evolution of stars and galaxies?

Thanks,
Kano

User avatar
Kano
Mage
Mage
Posts:101
Joined:Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:42 pm
Location:Denver

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by Kano » Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:17 pm

This is a bit off topic but in reading the Q & A from "Explorer", there was something especially interesting in this quote:
Virtually everyone has precognitive ability—the ability to see a distance in the temporal landscape. Open your eyes and pick where you want to go—create your own timeline. Grab your family and friends and head out to that unexplored, temporal territory and boldly go where no man has gone before. Then send someone back to tell the rest of us what’s out there, to help us decide if it is our path as well.
Is this who you are, Daniel?

Have you ever considered this perspective before?

User avatar
daniel
Professor
Professor
Posts:886
Joined:Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:33 pm
Location:P3X-774
Contact:

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by daniel » Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:19 pm

Kano wrote:I was wondering if there are any other researchers/uncommitted investigators other than Larson who you respect who say similar things about the evolution of stars and galaxies?
On that topic, Dewey Larson is the only one I am aware of.

Other researchers worth checking out:
  • Mathematics: Miles Mathis, unity-based Calculus and his history on mathematical screw-ups is very interesting.
  • Astronomy: Immanuel Velikovsky, origins of the solar system.
  • Psychology: Clare Graves, "Spiral Dynamics."
  • Religion: Mauro Biglino, a literal translation of the Hebrew Bible, showing it to be a history book, not a religious text.
  • Anthropology: Lloyd Pye, Intervention Theory.
They all have a piece of the puzzle worth "flipping over" to see how they fit together.
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii

User avatar
daniel
Professor
Professor
Posts:886
Joined:Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:33 pm
Location:P3X-774
Contact:

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by daniel » Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:21 pm

Kano wrote:Is this who you are, Daniel?
Have you ever considered this perspective before?
Guess I need to be more subtle next time, eh? :D

It is an old perspective; been around for centuries in Hermetics.
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii

User avatar
Kano
Mage
Mage
Posts:101
Joined:Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:42 pm
Location:Denver

Re: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, Time Lines, Ascension

Post by Kano » Sun Nov 25, 2012 10:26 am

Wow, now that's quite a thought! Do you feel like events in your life have been controlled or helped along to one degree or another in order to get your knowledge out into the public domain? Or perhaps since you studied time intimately and were privy to some ET tech, did you yourself ever time travel?

Post Reply